Kinsey report findings10/12/2023 Both public and religious schools will have to discard their sex ed courses. Whole shelves of books will have to be rewritten. "If the public learns the truth," she said yesterday, "the sexperts' in the field of human sexuality and the sex industry will be shaken to its foundations. Judith Reisman has argued repeatedly that Kinsey's findings cannot describe normal sexual behavior because they are based on evidence collected in good measure from prison inmates. Stockman's questions stem from the writings of an independent researcher in Arlington who has campaigned for 14 years against the Kinsey report. Half a century later, Stockman and the Family Research Council, a Washington conservative group dedicated to restoring "family values," seek to show that Kinsey's methods utterly discredit his theories of human sexuality, in turn destroying the foundation of contemporary attitudes toward sex education, sex outside marriage and tolerance of homosexuality. He says that nine of his "sources" observed pre-adolescents having orgasms, and adds, "Some of these adults are technically trained persons who have kept diaries." In fact, Bancroft says, there were not nine sources but just the one, and that man's training was in forestry. Kinsey's text is more than a little evasive on the source of his information. "How valid this information is, obviously one could argue about now," the director said. He speculates that Kinsey kept that bit to himself because he thought the public might not react well to his use of data from a sex criminal. "Kinsey gives the impression that the data came from three or four men, but it was just the one," Bancroft said. Nowhere does the Kinsey report reveal that its conclusions on the sexual capacity of a sample of 317 young boys are based solely on evidence provided by one man, and nowhere does the report reveal that that the man was a pedophile - or, as Bancroft calls him, "an omniphile, an extraordinarily active man." The findings were "an important substantiation of the Freudian view of sexuality as a component that is present in the human animal from earliest infancy," Kinsey wrote.īut as Bancroft said in an interview yesterday from his office in Bloomington, Ind., "the material in the tables came from one man, an extraordinary man with incredible numbers of sexual experiences on which he kept very careful notes." In "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male," the first major attempt to measure scientifically the range of human sexuality, Kinsey included two tables documenting pre-adolescent sexual experience. Stockman, a Texas Republican, called for a congressional investigation into Kinsey's pioneering 1949 report. Steve Stockman called Kinsey a fraud who used pedophiles to molest children for studies that should now be considered as tainted as Nazi medical experiments. John Bancroft, director of the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction at Indiana University in Bloomington, made the "clarification" about Kinsey's methods after a Washington press conference at which Rep. If man is not a sexual animal from the beginning, why teach children about condoms? Now a group of religious conservatives, backed by a House freshman not exactly known for his rhetorical restraint, argues that the sexual revolution of the latter half of this century is based on a fraud and must be reversed. Yesterday, the director of the Kinsey Institute revealed that Kinsey's conclusions on the sexuality of young children were based not on scientific study but on the secret history of a single pedophile who kept a diary of his experiences with 317 pre-adolescent boys. Half a century ago, Alfred Kinsey, the father of American sex research, published a report that revolutionized sexual mores, liberating discussion of sex and challenging centuries of beliefs about human appetites and capacities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |